izard: (Default)
[personal profile] izard
I studied physics in university, and I only had 3 programming related courses: numeric methods in Fortran, Operating systems, and CS 101 (finite automata, Turing machines, etc).

During last ~19 years working as a programmer full time I learned some tricks of our trade. But now I am thinking what would it take me today, if I was 18 y.o. and if I wanted to get just enough CS theory to understand how things work without formally studying CS.

I think just four books is enough: Aho&Ulman (compilers), Kormen(algorithms), Henessy&Patterson(hardware), and Tannenbaum (OS and networks). Am I missing something?

Upd: based on comments: Mao(crypto), Brooks(projects)

Date: 2018-02-23 06:03 am (UTC)
outputlogic: (Default)
From: [personal profile] outputlogic
>> I think just four books is enough...

That was exactly the reason I went to study Electrical Engineering instead of CS. It took many more than four books and Master's degree to learn some small part of EE reasonably well.

Profile

izard: (Default)
izard

November 2025

S M T W T F S
       1
2345678
910 1112131415
1617 1819202122
23242526272829
30      

Most Popular Tags

Page Summary

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 16th, 2026 01:59 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios